| | | |
| |
USER ID:     PASSWORD:    First time user,
 please register
/ / / Market Terms December 02, 2008, 02:06 AM (GMT+8) 
Market Terms | Traders Notebook | Options Trading | Psychological Evaluation | Market Dynamics Prediction Test
Capital Market TermsThis Week | All Terms
 
accumulated tax losses
Although no company enjoys being in a loss-making situation, one advantage of having a bad spell with red ink flowing over several years is the corresponding accumulation of those losses which can be used to reduce the tax charge in the first few years a profit is chalked up.

For instance, let's look at company Slow Start, that we assume operates in a country where the corporate tax rate is 30%. Slow Start loses $30m in its first year of operations and $5m in its second. In its third year it makes $10m and in its fourth $200m. The bad years add up to accumulated losses of $35m. These losses are looked upon by the pleasant gentlemen in that country's inland revenue department as accumulated tax credits. These credits fully offset the profit of the third year so no tax is payable. $10m worth of credits is exhausted in offsetting the profit of Year 3, leaving $25m in unutilised. In the fourth, bonanza, year when Slow Start makes a pre-tax profit of $200m, the tax department will offset that by the remaining tax credits, leaving $175m to be hit by the 30% tax charge. For that year the company's taxes come to $52.5m (30% of $175m, not 30% of $200m).

Note that because of the gradual utilisation of the accumulated tax credits, the effective tax rate of Slow Start in Year 3 is 0%, and in Year 4 it is 26.25% (that is 100% x 52.5m/200m). When analysing companies for potential investment worthiness it is important to look out for peculiarly low effective tax rates and to determine if and when accumulated tax losses run out. Usually when they are fully exhausted, a company's EPS will take a battering. (See taxation.)


bonus issue
If a company has sufficient shareholders' funds built up from its retained earnings over the years, its board may choose to reward shareholders by issuing new shares. If a 1-for-2 bonus issue is declared, then a shareholder with 20,000 shares will end up with 10,000 more. Generally speaking though nothing has intrinsically changed with the company. Therefore, logically speaking the company's market capitalisation should not change. This means that the new equity base including the 50% increase in the number of shares should see a per share price adjustment. If previously the shares had been trading at $3, after the bonus issue they should trade at {2/(1+2)} x $3 = $2.

As a general rule the expected adjustment in share price for an X-for-Y bonus issue, where X bonus shares are given out for every Y old shares held is:

Adjusted share price = {Y/(X+Y)} x the old price


In practice however because of the greater liquidity arising from more shares in the hands of investors and also because many companies prefer to maintain or even increase the dividend paid out on each share, there is usually a price adjustment to a level above the theoretically calculated price.


Gray's Deadly Sin 2
Don't be Ignorant. (Do your homework and gather sufficient information. Wisdom lies in knowing how much that is. Study the strategies of Graham, Buffett, Lynch, Fisher, Gray and other savvy investors and be humble enough to learn.)


NB. Underlined terms in definitions refer to other entries in the book.

 
  [Source: Your A-Z Guide to the Stock Market - and all you need to know about Capital Terms; published by Times Books International. © 1997 Rajen Devadason]

Those interested can order it at http://www.timesone.com.sg/te
 
   |  |  |  |  |  | 
  Copyright © 2000-2008 Forum Digital Sdn Bhd (505561-K). All rights reserved. (F)
  By accessing any information beyond this page, you agree to abide by the zoomFinance Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.